The Story of Arundel, with photographic illustrations by W. B. Allison, by Francis D. Allison, published 1931 (16 pp. & 16 plates, Bognor Regis: The Arundel Press) accessible at: R.I.B.A. Library
The Booklet of Arundel: Castle and Town, by Mervyn D. Francis, published 1932 (Arundel Press)
The Little Town of Arundel, by Francis D. Allison, published 1947 (Bognor Regis: The Arundel Press) accessible at: W.S.R.O. [Lib 8244]
The Fitzalan Chapel, by Francis D. Allison, published 1949 (24 pp., Bognor Regis: The Arundel Press) accessible at: W.S.R.O. [Lib 6517] & R.I.B.A. Library
The Story of Arundel, by Francis D. Allison, published 1950 (Bognor Regis: The Arundel Press)
The Sussex Bedside Anthology, compiled by Margaret Goldsworthy, published 1950 (619 pp., Bognor Regis: The Arundel Press) accessible at: W.S.R.O. [Lib 2831][Lib 12403] & West Sussex Libraries & East Sussex Libraries
Review by A. A. in Sussex Notes and Queries, August, 1950:This is a comprehensive anthology of Sussex lore, a first-rate "browsing book" both for the Native and the Foreigner whose "heart is there". The Sussex-loving poets are perhaps a loyal rather than a great company but the reader will find many old friends among them - Kipling, Belloc and others - and probably meet several new ones. There is much in the book besides poetry. In fact, there is something for everybody, historical, geographical and antiquarian information, extracts from old county records, epitaphs, letters and diaries kept by Sussex characters in remote and more robust times. There is even (in keeping with the modern convention) a quiz. Miss Margaret Goldsworthy is to be warmly congratulated on the extent and success of her researches. The book is handsomely produced and fully and carefully indexed.
In Beautiful West Sussex, A Pictorial Record with Historical notes, by Francis D. Allison, published 1951 (64 pp., Bognor Regis: The Arundel Press) accessible at: W.S.R.O. [Lib 5138] & West Sussex Libraries
In Saxon Sussex, by Alec Barr-Hamilton, published c.1953 (144 pp., Bognor Regis: The Arundel Press) accessible at: W.S.R.O. [Lib 13454][Lib 94] & West Sussex Libraries & East Sussex Libraries
Review by G. D. Johnson in Sussex Notes and Queries, November 1953:The expressed object of this book is "to serve as such signposts for the amateur in his quest for the Sussex of our Saxon forefathers" and the text fully carries out this object by the historical matter which is interesting and helpful and also by descriptions of the Saxon remains still to be found. The Author's style is clear and it is a very readable book. There are naturally a few criticisms. It is a pity to introduce unnecessary controversy into a book of this nature and the Author's hero-worship of St. Wilfred rather blinds him to the real nature of the controversy where (in addition to the King) Wilfred was also opposed by the great Archbishop Theodore of Tarsus. The Author also has the common tendency to assume the coast-line was the same (except for minor details at Selsey) at the period he writes of as now, though there is evidence that in Roman times it was a mile further out and suffered great change when Lyonesse is believed to have perished and again when Old Winchelsea was overwhelmed. (Incidentally the "map of Saxon Sussex" should be corrected by showing Old Winchelsea is its conjectured site and not on the site to which Edward I removed it). A list of Saxon Bishops of Selsey would be useful in a future edition and the Author might eliminate the tiresome and annoying insertion of "A.D." before dates which (as in the case of references to the Christian Church) cannot possibly be " B.C.," see for instance p. 127 when the Vicar of Bosham is stated to have found bones in his Church "A.D. 1865." There are minor inaccuracies; Wisborough Green does not like to be called Wisborough; Chithurst Bridge "an old bridge of sandstone" (p. 75) was only built in 1858 and is largely brick; the Elsted Stream joins the Rother above Trotton Bridge and not near Stedham; Stopham bridge was built 1423 and not early 14th century, and the existence of a ford over the Arun at Ford cannot now be asserted (S.N.Q. xi, 25 & 141).